Vasco Knight@LINC 2024 | SPORTS Trial Insights: Evidence-Based Selection of DCB, DES, or BMS for TASC C/D Lesions
时间: 2025-06-20
作者: 小编:
阅读量: 58
关键词:

Abstract


As the first prospective randomized three-arm study comparing drug-coated balloons (DCB), drug-eluting stents (DES), and bare-metal stents (BMS) for TASC C/D femoropopliteal lesions, the SPORTS trial demonstrated superior 12-month angiographic and clinical outcomes with DES (Eluvia™). DCB (SeQuent Please™) showed high bailout stenting rates (58%) impacting long-term patency. This article integrates device characteristics to guide complex lesion management.


Introduction


Treatment selection for TASC C/D femoropopliteal lesions has long lacked high-level evidence. Conventional interventions face challenges including high restenosis rates. The SPORTS trial, with randomized data from 224 patients (mean lesion length 22.3cm), provides critical decision-making insights.


27b6543536a06bad5e935458646970b.jpg


Key Findings: SPORTS Trial Outcomes


1. Study Design


Three-arm RCT: 224 patients (Rutherford 2-4, lesions ≥13cm) randomized to:


DCB: SeQuent Please™ OTW (B.Braun)


DES: Eluvia™ (Boston Scientific)


BMS: Bare nitinol stent


Primary endpoint: Core lab-assessed angiographic stenosis at 12 months


f251202d21705a0a0ed44d1516e918c.jpg


2. Critical Results

1750409691529.png


Subgroup analysis:


DCB bailout cause: 58% required stenting for dissections


b6e065b2f6153aa530edff36f26fc57.jpg


Calcification impact: DES advantage amplified in moderate-severe calcification (38-41%)


3. Clinical Implications


DES superiority: Eluvia™ achieved 34.7% lower stenosis vs BMS in long lesions


aaf60c7c01ef06f3231dca8bf286c7d.jpg


DCB limitations: SeQuent Please™ non-inferior to BMS but 60% required bailout


a082098e6cb136dc69675b1db79284e.jpg


Lesion-specific: DES showed greater lumen gain in occlusions (MLD 4.2±0.7mm)


Technological Advances: DCB Optimization


Data from Medtronic's Prevail DCB highlight evolutionary directions:


Delivery enhancement:


Pushability: Next-gen DCBs reach 210g (vs 148g in SeQuent Please™ NEO)


Trackability: Tapered tip + ultrathin balloon material reduce resistance


Drug delivery:


Urea excipient: Rapid drug transfer in 30-60s (similar to SeQuent Please™)


Paclitaxel dose: 3.5μg/mm² (aligned with IN.PACT series)


Evidence base:


SCAAR study: 0.8% thrombosis rate at 2 years in 1,797 patients


Complex lesion efficacy: Strong performance in bifurcation (22.8%) and ISR (28%)


Conclusion


For TASC C/D lesions, SPORTS evidence supports:


First-line strategy: DES (Eluvia™) for lesions >15cm, especially calcified/occluded;


DCB role: SeQuent Please™ for stent-averse patients, with bailout stents available;


Technology evolution: Next-gen DCBs must overcome delivery limitations (e.g., Prevail's 210g pushability).


Future studies require >1-year data to validate DES durability and explore DCB-stent hybrid approaches.